<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Impact Forensics</title>
	
	<link>http://www.impactforensics.com</link>
	<description>Chicago based Computer Forensics and Electronic Discovery</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ImpactForensics" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Lobbyist Pleads Guilty to Tossing Her BlackBerry</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/349530829/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/29/lobbyist-pleads-guilty-to-tossing-her-blackberry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News &amp; Events]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[department of jus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electronically stored information]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[esi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[handheld device]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description>Lobbyist Pleads Guilty to Tossing Her BlackBerry in a Fast Food Trash Can

Most people go to great lengths to make sure their BlackBerry is always at their side.  In the extreme, we all know  &amp;#8220;CrackBerry&amp;#8221; users (maybe you&amp;#8217;re one?) who go into email withdrawal after just a few moments of mini-keyboard denial.

So the idea of [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/349530829" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/29/lobbyist-pleads-guilty-to-tossing-her-blackberry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/29/lobbyist-pleads-guilty-to-tossing-her-blackberry/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Malpractice Suit Against Kay Scholer Alleges Failure to Produce “Hundreds of Thousands” of Documents</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/326117624/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/03/legal-malpractice-suit-against-kay-scholer-alleges-failure-to-produce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles &amp; Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[antitrust suit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[discovery phase]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Failure to Produce Documents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legal Malpractice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/03/legal-malpractice-suit-against-kay-scholer-alleges-failure-to-produce/</guid>
		<description>Dallas-based chemical company Celanese Corp. has filed suit against the New York Law firm of Kaye Scholer LLP and two former Kaye Scholer lawyers, accusing them of malpractice during the discovery phase of an antitrust suit. Celanese alleges that Kaye Scholer failed to turn over to an opposing party &amp;#8220;hundreds of thousands&amp;#8221; of documents that [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/326117624" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/03/legal-malpractice-suit-against-kay-scholer-alleges-failure-to-produce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/03/legal-malpractice-suit-against-kay-scholer-alleges-failure-to-produce/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Former HP Executive Indicted in Email Case</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/326056005/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/03/former-h-p-executive-indicted-in-email-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles &amp; Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[computer forensics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[confidential email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[e discovery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emails]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[incriminating Email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/03/former-h-p-executive-indicted-in-email-case/</guid>
		<description>Well, just when you thought executives at the most technological-savvy companies in the world would no longer fall into the trap of sending damaging or incriminating Email to each other&amp;#8230;.think again. A former Hewlitt Packard vice president has been indicted by federal prosecutors for allegedly passing a confidential Email from his previous employer, IBM to [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/326056005" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/03/former-h-p-executive-indicted-in-email-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/03/former-h-p-executive-indicted-in-email-case/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact Forensics Awarded Default Judgment for Client</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/324467071/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/01/impact-forensics-awarded-default-judgment-for-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News &amp; Events]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Adverse Inference]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[computer forensic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[destroying]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electronic data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electronically stored information]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[esi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[expert report]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[free space]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hiding assets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[overwrite deleted data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[recover]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spoliation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unallocated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/01/impact-forensics-awarded-default-judgment-for-client/</guid>
		<description>Impact Forensics Awarded Default Judgment for Client in Bankruptcy Case 
Computer Forensic Expert Report Showing Spoliation Leads to Adverse Inference In re:  Jeffrey Eckert, Debtor, David Grochocinski Trustee, Plaintiff, vs. Schlossberg, et al., Defendants.  April 11, 2008
&amp;#8220;&amp;#8230;the expert&amp;#8217;s report indicates that somebody has basically shredded or destroyed the relevant and other data on the three computers [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/324467071" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/01/impact-forensics-awarded-default-judgment-for-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/07/01/impact-forensics-awarded-default-judgment-for-client/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>When is Under Seal Not Under Seal</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/305706280/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/06/05/when-is-under-seal-not-under-seal-ge-finds-out-the-hard-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles &amp; Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[back-up tapes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electronic discovery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sex-discrimination]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[terabytes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[terabytes of data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/06/05/when-is-under-seal-not-under-seal-ge-finds-out-the-hard-way/</guid>
		<description> GE Finds Out the Hard Way 
It always makes us wonder if life in the law weren&amp;#8217;t a little less thorny back before the days of email and electronic discovery, back-up tapes and terabytes of data. The latest saga comes courtesy of the class action sex-discrimination &amp;#8230;
Get the rest of Michael J. Eng&amp;#8217;s story here&amp;#8230;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/305706280" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/06/05/when-is-under-seal-not-under-seal-ge-finds-out-the-hard-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/06/05/when-is-under-seal-not-under-seal-ge-finds-out-the-hard-way/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Rules E-Discovery Disclosure Goof Waives Attorney-Client Privilege</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/305696722/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/06/05/judge-rules-e-discovery-disclosure-waives-attorney-client-privilege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles &amp; Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[attorney-client privilege]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[e discovery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[federal magistrate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sued for infringement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chief Magistrate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/06/05/judge-rules-e-discovery-disclosure-waives-attorney-client-privilege/</guid>
		<description>A federal magistrate in Baltimore has ruled a company sued for infringement has no attorney-client privilege in 165 documents mistakenly turned over to its opponent in e-discovery. The documents included several communications between the company Creative Pipe Inc. and its lawyers. U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Paul Grimm ruled Creative Pipe…
read the story at ABA Journal [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/305696722" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/06/05/judge-rules-e-discovery-disclosure-waives-attorney-client-privilege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/06/05/judge-rules-e-discovery-disclosure-waives-attorney-client-privilege/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>More Tech, Less Emotion Please, Federal Judges Suggest</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/350530566/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/27/more-tech-less-emotion-please-federal-judges-suggest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News &amp; Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description>Speaking last week at a 7th Circuit bar meeting, federal district judges had a few suggestions for the lawyers who appear before them.
High on the list of dos: appropriate use of technology by those who have mastered it. But excessive emotion should be avoided, the judges agreed. Their advice was reported in a National Law [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/350530566" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/27/more-tech-less-emotion-please-federal-judges-suggest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/27/more-tech-less-emotion-please-federal-judges-suggest/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade Secrets Gone in a Flash?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/306101617/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/26/trade-secrets-gone-in-a-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Impact Forensics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Client Advisories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/26/trade-secrets-gone-in-a-flash/</guid>
		<description>In the blink of an eye, trade secrets can move from computer to USB drive; from secret to stolen.
When it comes to protecting your client’s most valuable intellectual assets, and/or proving
your case, the steps you take in the critical moments after the discovery of a potential trade secret theft make all the difference in the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/306101617" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/26/trade-secrets-gone-in-a-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/26/trade-secrets-gone-in-a-flash/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Tips for Preserving Computer Evidence After an Incident</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/291757833/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/16/ten-tips-for-preserving-computer-evidence-after-an-incident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Articles &amp; Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Computer Evidence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[computer forensics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[computer forensics experts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[crime scene]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[data collection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[forensic images]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[preserve]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spoliation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/2007/08/25/ten-tips-for-preserving-computer-evidence-after-an-incident/</guid>
		<description>If you have a possible trade secret case in your hands and believe you will
need computer forensics in the near future, there are some important steps to
take to ensure the collection of valuable data without spoliation. Treat the
scene as a true crime scene, and use these tips as a guideline for your trade
secret case: 
Don’t [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/291757833" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/16/ten-tips-for-preserving-computer-evidence-after-an-incident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/16/ten-tips-for-preserving-computer-evidence-after-an-incident/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact Forensics Sponsors 2008 Electronic Discovery Conference</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~3/291434359/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/15/impact-forensics-sponsors-2008-electronic-discovery-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News &amp; Events]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery Issues]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery strategies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Discovery Conference]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electronically Stored]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[esi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ethical issues]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inadvertent disclosure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law Bulletin Publishing Company]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New Federal Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/15/impact-forensics-sponsors-2008-electronic-discovery-conference/</guid>
		<description>Workshop Tackles Current eDiscovery Issues
Impact Forensics will be a co-sponsor of this year’s Electronic Discovery Conference
hosted by the Law Bulletin Publishing Company. Topics planned for this popular
conference include “Meet &amp;#38; Confer” strategies related to the new Federal Rules,
proactive eDiscovery strategies, tips on where experts find Electronically Stored
Information (ESI), and ethical issues related to inadvertent disclosure [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImpactForensics/~4/291434359" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/15/impact-forensics-sponsors-2008-electronic-discovery-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.impactforensics.com/2008/05/15/impact-forensics-sponsors-2008-electronic-discovery-conference/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
